<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alternatives to Empire &#187; Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alternativestoempire.org/category/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alternativestoempire.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:51:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Naomi Klein on Climate Debt: Why Rich Countries Should Pay Reparations To Poor Countries For The Climate Crisis.</title>
		<link>http://alternativestoempire.org/2009/11/27/naomi-klein-on-climate-debt-why-rich-countries-should-pay-reparations-to-poor-countries-for-the-climate-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://alternativestoempire.org/2009/11/27/naomi-klein-on-climate-debt-why-rich-countries-should-pay-reparations-to-poor-countries-for-the-climate-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternatives to Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives; capitalism; power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alternativestoempire.org/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But, yet, the mass movement that we were a part of ten years ago really isn?t present in the streets. And I think a lot of that has to do with, perhaps, the ?Obama effect? in the United States where everyone is still in this waiting pattern, hoping that he?s going to save the day.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Copenhagen climate summit two weeks away, best-selling journalist Naomi Klein examines the grass-roots movement behind the climate debate proposal that argues all the costs associated with adapting to a more hostile ecology?everything from building stronger sea walls to switching to cleaner, more expensive technologies?are the responsibility of the countries that created the crisis. Klein also discusses the 10th anniversary of the Seattle WTO protests and the 10th anniversary of her first book, ?No Logo.?</p>
<p>For More Read: <a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/23/naomi_klein_on_climate_debt_why">http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/23/naomi_klein_on_climate_debt_why</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alternativestoempire.org/2009/11/27/naomi-klein-on-climate-debt-why-rich-countries-should-pay-reparations-to-poor-countries-for-the-climate-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Moves Towards Energy, Not Oil</title>
		<link>http://alternativestoempire.org/2007/10/23/china-moves-towards-energy-not-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://alternativestoempire.org/2007/10/23/china-moves-towards-energy-not-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alternatives to Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alternativestoempire.org/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="color: #000000;">By</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alternativestoempire.org/2007/10/23/china-moves-towards-energy-not-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Security: An Alternative Foreign Policy Framework</title>
		<link>http://alternativestoempire.org/2007/08/23/just-security-an-alternative-foreign-policy-framework/</link>
		<comments>http://alternativestoempire.org/2007/08/23/just-security-an-alternative-foreign-policy-framework/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alternativestoempire.org/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Foreign Policy in Focus
Published by Foreign Policy in Focus, the report ?Just Security? proposes an alternative foreign policy framework for the United States, and by extension those countries which fall within its orbit. The report states:
?Current U.S. foreign policy is unjust and breeds insecurity for all. In seeking an alternative, we should not revive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>by Foreign Policy in Focus</strong></p>
<p>Published by Foreign Policy in Focus, the report ?Just Security? proposes an alternative foreign policy framework for the United States, and by extension those countries which fall within its orbit. The report states:</p>
<p>?Current U.S. foreign policy is unjust and breeds insecurity for all. In seeking an alternative, we should not revive the failed policies of the past. Instead, we should chart a new relationship between the United States and the world.</p>
<p>Our common future faces daunting challenges. War, poverty, terrorism, loose nukes, and climate change make us all feel less secure than a decade ago. The Bush adminis tration?s foreign policy has brought U.S. popularity in the world to new lows. At home, it has generated widespread dissatisfaction across the political spectrum.</p>
<p>Such widespread public dissatisfaction offers an opportunity to transform the national conversation from the framework of fear that has prevailed since 9/11 to a broader response to global ills and injustices.</p>
<p>The growing public awareness of the climate crisis, the need to address the Middle East in a comprehensive manner, the wasteful extravagance of military spending, the continued threat of nuclear proliferation and nuclear use, and the corrosive effects of global inequality have revealed the inadequacies not only of current U.S. foreign policy but the Democratic Party?s 2006 ?real security? doctrine as well.</p>
<p>With its emphasis on fighting wars, the Bush administration has insisted on focusing just on security. We must focus instead on a just security, because there can be no real security without justice. The United States should act as a global partner not a global boss. We must restore principles of fairness and equity into our international conduct.?</p>
<p>The</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alternativestoempire.org/2007/08/23/just-security-an-alternative-foreign-policy-framework/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
